+- VGFacts (https://archive.vgfacts.com)
+-- Forum: Main (https://archive.vgfacts.com/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Trivia Discussion (https://archive.vgfacts.com/forum-17.html)
+---- Forum: Trivia Disputes (https://archive.vgfacts.com/forum-15.html)
+---- Thread: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent (/thread-3700.html)
Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - CuriousUserX90 - 11-23-2016
https://www.vgfacts.com/game/?developers%5B%5D=51
*The first Mario Party, Mario Party 5, Mario Party Advance, and Mario Party 8 which were all developed by Hudson don't say both Hudson and Nintendo like Mario Party 7 and Mario Party DS do, and Mario Party 4 (also developed by Hudson) only says Nintendo, not very consistent. The Mario Party Franchise is property of Nintendo/not Third Party, so Nintendo should be listed. As for Mario Party 9 and Mario Party: Island Tour, no longer developed by Hudson, it's fine that they just say Nintendo as opposed to Nintendo and Nd Cude (Nd Cude is one of the Developer Names that VGFacts doesn't approve of).
RE: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - Kakariko Kid - 11-23-2016
Nd Cube is a subsidiary of Nintendo. Rockstar North is a subsidiary of Rockstar Games and Rockstar Games is the only choice on that list.
RE: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - CuriousUserX90 - 11-24-2016
(11-23-2016, 09:10 AM)Kakariko Kid Wrote: Nd Cube is a subsidiary of Nintendo. Rockstar North is a subsidiary of Rockstar Games and Rockstar Games is the only choice on that list.
I guess Nd abbreviates Nintendo. There are a number of other developer names that VGFacts don't accept, like Heavy Iron Studios, Blue Tongue Entertainment, Ensemble Studios, Blue Fang Games, Vicarious Visions, Sora ltd, HAL Laboratory, Retro Studios, Intelligent Systems, Omega Force, Camelot, and Radical Entertainment, not even if you were to put them in when submitting a submission to a game not already on VGFacts.
RE: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - Kakariko Kid - 11-24-2016
Heavy Iron, Sora Ltd, and Camelot are independent from what I looked up. Interesting.
RE: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - CuriousUserX90 - 03-01-2017
(11-24-2016, 06:20 AM)CuriousUserX90 Wrote:(11-23-2016, 09:10 AM)Kakariko Kid Wrote: Nd Cube is a subsidiary of Nintendo. Rockstar North is a subsidiary of Rockstar Games and Rockstar Games is the only choice on that list.
I guess Nd abbreviates Nintendo. There are a number of other developer names that VGFacts don't accept, like Heavy Iron Studios, Blue Tongue Entertainment, Ensemble Studios, Blue Fang Games, Vicarious Visions, Sora ltd, HAL Laboratory, Retro Studios, Intelligent Systems, Omega Force, Camelot, and Radical Entertainment, not even if you were to put them in when submitting a submission to a game not already on VGFacts.
Looks like they decided to accept Intelligent Systems after all with this game: https://www.vgfacts.com/game/battleclash/
*Despite not accepted it as a Developer Name for other games that they developed like the Paper Mario ones (they all just say Nintendo).
RE: Mario Party Games' VGFacts Pages - Inconsistent - CuriousUserX90 - 03-05-2017
(11-23-2016, 12:01 AM)CuriousUserX90 Wrote: https://www.vgfacts.com/game/?developers%5B%5D=51
*The first Mario Party, Mario Party 5, Mario Party Advance, and Mario Party 8 which were all developed by Hudson don't say both Hudson and Nintendo like Mario Party 7 and Mario Party DS do, and Mario Party 4 (also developed by Hudson) only says Nintendo, not very consistent. The Mario Party Franchise is property of Nintendo/not Third Party, so Nintendo should be listed. As for Mario Party 9 and Mario Party: Island Tour, no longer developed by Hudson, it's fine that they just say Nintendo as opposed to Nintendo and Nd Cude (Nd Cude is one of the Developer Names that VGFacts doesn't approve of).
Let's make that Mario Party 2 and Mario Party 3 as well for simply saying Hudson as opposed to Hudson and Nintendo: https://www.vgfacts.com/game/marioparty2/ and https://www.vgfacts.com/game/marioparty3/
*The Mario Party franchise is not third party/Nintendo Property, so Nintendo should also be one of the developer names.