Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - Printable Version +- VGFacts (https://archive.vgfacts.com) +-- Forum: Main (https://archive.vgfacts.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Site Discussion (https://archive.vgfacts.com/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement (/thread-413.html) |
Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - Symthic - 04-23-2013 On DidYouKnowGaming, the big square VGFacts image is grammatically incorrect. It reads "VGFacts had thousands of pieces of trivia, and is updated frequently." There shouldn't be a comma. A comma should be used with a conjunction only when being used to combine a group of nouns (i.e. Mario, Zelda, and Metroid) or when combining two complete sentences. "is updated frequently" is not a complete sentence. If it was "it is updated frequently," then it would need a comma. I'm not trying to be condescending; I'm just trying to help out. RE: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - Petie - 04-23-2013 While you're technically correct, I'd just like to point out that a comma can also be used less formally to indicate a pause in a sentence's pace (more traditionally in dialogue). However, I do agree that the comma isn't actually necessary there, though I suppose it isn't hurting either. Thanks for pointing that out. RE: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 04-23-2013 I agree with Petie. Also, some people find it easier to read when commas, like the one used in this case, break up a sentence. RE: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - Combat Lobster - 04-23-2013 Might I suggest writing the next Ad entirely in engirsh. "Vgfacts offering portions of finer points with gaming pleasure well-run often!" RE: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - Petie - 04-23-2013 (04-23-2013, 07:33 PM)SERIOUSLY THOUGH Wrote: I agree with Petie. The commas you used there were actually used correctly though, so that makes sense :) RE: Gramattically Incorrect Advertisement - SERIOUSLY THOUGH - 04-24-2013 (04-23-2013, 08:42 PM)Petie Wrote:(04-23-2013, 07:33 PM)SERIOUSLY THOUGH Wrote: I agree with Petie. I was actually toying with the idea of adding a disclaimer to my post saying that " 'this case' refers to what Symthic was referring to". I should have done so ! |