08-07-2014, 03:17 AM
(08-06-2014, 04:38 PM)gamemaster1991 Wrote:(08-06-2014, 08:33 AM)Mass Distraction Wrote:(08-05-2014, 08:20 PM)gamemaster1991 Wrote: Resident Evil 6: Just an overall worse version of RE5 (which I liked).
Version? I was so much different from RE5 that the only thing they had in common was Chris as a playable character.
It's as much a version of RE 5 as RE5 is a version of RE4, which I only see miner points in. RE6 just seems to an action game that wants to keep the franchise alive.
But isn't by that logic every sequel ever to any game just a "version" of them? RE5 is way closer to RE4 than RE6. In RE6 there are no tank controls, you can move while you aim/shoot/reload, you have generally more freedom to manouver your character, your weapons aren't tied to your person, there are multiple campaigns and even the AI is way better. I really don't see how those two games can be considered a "version" of the other.