Important Announcement
Forum has been made read-only. Please click here for more information or here to return to VGFacts.

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Poll: Do you agree with the Zelda official timeline?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yep. Yes. Oui. Uh-huh. Sure. Si.
41.67%
5 41.67%
No
16.67%
2 16.67%
Not sure (maybe I look into things too much)
25.00%
3 25.00%
I don't really care
16.67%
2 16.67%
Total 12 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Zelda official timeline. Agree or disagree?
#9
(12-29-2015, 04:36 AM)Arjahn Wrote:
(12-28-2015, 02:48 PM)RepentantSky Wrote: Yeah no, the Zelda timeline makes no damn sense and still excludes several games. For example, where's a link between worlds? I assume that it's not the same Link from "A Link to the Past" but then how do they connect? Honestly, retrolinx's idea about these stories just being retelling's just makes a lot more sense than a branching timeline.

Its my understanding that the reason Link Between Worlds was excluded was because it came out two years after Hyrule Historia was published.

You aren't wrong, but they've also had a lot of time to include it in the timeline in some way since it's release. Not doing so makes it seem all the more likely that they just made a timeline up to the most recent Zelda game at the release of the Historia with little or no plans to keep updating it afterwards. Something ought to be done before the new Zelda comes out or I really am going to call total crap on this timeline. It's just a really odd one that doesn't make a lot of sense if it doesn't keep updating.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Zelda official timeline. Agree or disagree? - by RepentantSky - 12-29-2015, 04:55 AM

Forum Jump: