05-28-2017, 05:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-22-2018, 07:39 PM by ZpaceJ0ck0.
Edit Reason: Grammar
)
(05-28-2017, 03:54 PM)Boyobmas Wrote: Here's something unintentionally funny/stupid:
https://mic.com/articles/177307/street-f....PeylaoyYV
The way pronounces Ryu's name (pronouncing it as RAYOOH rather than 'ree-you') in the video featured in the article, along with this statement:
Quote:Violent Ken, on the other hand, is a brainwashed version of Ken. He's first introduced in the second Street Fighter animated movie when he's manipulated by M. Bison. It's worth noting that in the movie, Ken's skin tone doesn't change.
Should be proof that this fool knows next to nothing about the SF series.
Brainwashed (Violent) Ken, in particular, dind't made his debut in the SFII Animated film, but rather, the Kanzaki SFII manga. http://forums.shoryuken.com/discussion/c...t_11147596
Second, there wasn't another animated film before the SFII one we all know. I think he confused with Jean-Claude Van Damme's flick.... which was in live action.
Now, regarding the rest of this article...
Artists tend to use colour schemes/palettes to convey story and gameplay elements, as colour can represent something. Like blue for allies and red for enemies for example. Darker colour tones can be used to convey someone as "evil", it has nothing to do with their race.
And besides, their hair gets lighter in the evil versions. That doesn't count? Also, ken's eyes change from brown to pitch white, and ryu's change from brown to red. The darker skin surrounded by lighter features creates a more jarring contrast. None of that matters? Just the skin?
Okay, I got it. Skin color is literally all that matters. (this mentality isn't racist at all, because reasons)