03-10-2018, 06:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2018, 07:01 PM by ZpaceJ0ck0.
Edit Reason: Grammar
)
Today I've wathced the second and third Die Hard movies.
Die Hard 2: About as enganging and action packed as the original; the wit displayed in this film saved it from being a mediocre follow-up. Bruce Willis once again gives a pretty good performance as the lead character John McClane, althought the villians weren't left behind either.
Die Hard with a Vengeance (aka Die Hard 3): This one stands out for being more fast paced that the original (not that I disliked the "slow" pacing of the other two). Samuel L. Jackson nailed as Zeus Carver, a normal guy with some bias who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The introduction of puzzle-solving sequences were quite creative and gives a breath of fresh air to the franchise.
Die Hard 2: About as enganging and action packed as the original; the wit displayed in this film saved it from being a mediocre follow-up. Bruce Willis once again gives a pretty good performance as the lead character John McClane, althought the villians weren't left behind either.
Die Hard with a Vengeance (aka Die Hard 3): This one stands out for being more fast paced that the original (not that I disliked the "slow" pacing of the other two). Samuel L. Jackson nailed as Zeus Carver, a normal guy with some bias who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The introduction of puzzle-solving sequences were quite creative and gives a breath of fresh air to the franchise.