Game Grumps discussion

[RepentantSky]

They both are good at video games. Hell every single one of them is good. They just don't know how to manage playing a game and talking at the same time. They focus too much on being funny and having something to say to actuly play the game. It also does not help that they don't finsh games becuse they lose intrest in them.

I'm supposed to buy that? Yeah, not happening. Most let's players start off that way but Game grumps has existed far too long for that be a problem, and if it is, it's because they suck at games. 

Castlevania III, Gun.Smoke, Punch Out!. Three games that they play that show off that they don't suck. There's even a time durring No Time to Explan where one of them (Ross was playing I think) was sucking becuse they were talking but when he relised it he stoped talking and finshed the level (which I think explanes most of that playthough).

I've unsubscribed/stopped watching not because they suck at the games, but because they are not interesting/entertaining any more. I'm getting more of what I'm looking for in the GGs out of Markiplier than the GGs anymore. I'm not sure when they stoped being entertaing, but it has been almost a year since I saw a whole playlist.

That a bs argument. Those three games are ones they've had years to get good at, and Ross doesn't play days worth of games as a time for the sake of recording so he's still at that point where he could get distracted while trying to play a game. Whats more, I'm only talking about Dan and Ego, who have both been playing far too long for that to be believable. Also, can I just ask, why do you care to defend them when one, they don't care what I think anymore than you do, and two, you don't watch them anymore so you shouldn't care what I say. I just want to know why you bother when there's no gain for you.