09-15-2013, 08:43 AM
(09-14-2013, 04:32 PM)BumblebeeCody Wrote:(09-14-2013, 03:59 PM)retrolinkx Wrote: I'm really confused here.
You talk about wanting better graphics, but your pictures show nothing but better resoution.
Are you asking for better graphics, or a higher resolution?
A console with better graphical power. The ability to play games in 1080p(which also factors in having a better CPU, GPU etc). Nintendo should've made the Wii a console that's graphically able to rival the Xbox 360 and PS3 but continue to make the games they want. We still get Twilight Princess, Kirby Epic Yarn and Brawl, but if they chose to make the console as powerful as the other two, then games would overall be better.
Basically saying, there's nothing wrong(much) with Nintendos games, but their hardware is severely underpowered which limits what games could look like if they had chosen to opt in for better hardware. Which reiterates my point in that graphics do matter. With high-end hardware, comes incredible resolution/graphics output.
(Better resolution is better graphics)
Nintendo are behind again with the Wii U in that it's only 1080p(and only one game is 1080p (ZombiU)) and yet Microsoft and Sony are pushing for 4K TVs.
To be fair the PS3 didn't have that many 1080p games. I owned multiple high-profile PS3 games when I had the console, and the only ones that were 1080p were Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time and The Last of Us.
Also yeah 60fps > Anything else. It actually annoys me to an extent when they make things look nice at the expense of 60fps (I mean bloody SONIC GENERATIONS was only 60fps on PC for Christ's sake!).
And finally, if you want pretty graphics then PC is and will always be master race.