Important Announcement
Forum has been made read-only. Please click here for more information or here to return to VGFacts.

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
Five nights at freddy's 4: The final chapter
#31
Freddy Got Fingered: Fifth Friday of the Month
-Also, I never played FNaF.
-And this dude ^ "不明?" has the coolest name on the site until I find out what it means.
Reply
#32
Its Japanese, literally means unknown with a question mark at the end. A reference to Tekken, perhaps?
Reply
#33
Enough with the jokes people. The game has been released. Surprise surprise.

According to some of the lets plays I've seen. Its about a kid(the atari game sequences show its a boy) who's being taunted by nightmare versions of the animatronics while his birthday party is coming up.
Reply
#34
It's been less than a year, and 4 games have been made. People complain about Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed getting annual sequels, while this guy was making quarterly sequels.

How easy is it to slap these games together?

Also; willing to bet lots of money that FNAF 5 will be announced and released by Halloween.
Reply
#35
It's been a day and people have already beaten the game. I'm impressed and very concerned that people can do this. The good news is that I can watch the entire boring game all at once. Bad news is that this really is a boring game. Talk about a waste of a perfectly good game.

Now all I have to do is wait for Matt Pat make a new video telling us that he now has evidence that the phone guy is the purple guy.

Also, purple guy cameo. Someone can take it if they want.
Reply
#36
4 games in and it still hasn't died. Amazing.
I imagine the game is just the same thing as the other 3 prior to it but with more "new" content, right?
Reply
#37
After watching a video that had the ending
.
Reply
#38
Reply
#39
I just watched a video of a man crying over how "sad" the ending to the game was. I don't even.
Reply
#40
Ummm...kinda disappointed about what the Bite of '87 is. Meh. It was an interesting premise. I still think there's more to it.
Reply
#41
(07-26-2015, 11:48 AM)BumblebeeCody Wrote: Ummm...kinda disappointed about what the Bite of '87 is. Meh. It was an interesting premise. I still think there's more to it.

I think the many speculations on what was theorized from the Bite of 87 is what killed it here. Although. It kinda makes you wonder if this 'mistake' that the brother made, later made him get revenge for burning the place down in the third game. I theorized that this game is the very first one for the story. He messes around with his little brother to the extremes when he doesn't realize it, and it puts his little brother in a coma(as well as giving the restaurant a bad name). Purple guy notices this, and he begins to do this to the other children by dressing up as Freddy. Developing his 'sickness' for killing children. 

I can only assume that the young kid didn't make it through the coma(if he did, that could explain the low payment that was received in the first game). Kinda makes you wonder why he would even bother working there after being nearly almost killed from being there as a kid. Taking place after the events of the second game, the first leads to where the purple guy gets 'attacked' by the spirits of the dead children in the first game. The older brother decides to apply for the third game, only to do a favor for his younger brother to put the entire thing of Freddy and his friends out with flames since it reminds him of the his mistake that almost killed his brother.
Reply
#42
The problem with this being the bite of '87 is how it doesn't make sense. Scientifically speaking the kid shouldn't be able to fear the monsters he does due to the obvious frontal lobe damage he suffered when being bitten by Golden Freddy. That ending ticked me off because we realize this is all in the kid's head after the attack which means it doesn't work. A little bit of research and some proper time spent on the game's story would have fixed that problem right up and I'm annoyed Scott rushed this out without doing that first.
Reply
#43
This could have made more sense if Scott thought this over real good before rushing it out like he always does when making the FNAF games.
Reply
#44
(08-02-2015, 07:54 PM)CLXcool Wrote: This could have made more sense if Scott thought this over real good before rushing it out like he always does when making the FNAF games.

Funnily enough, this one took the longest to make (outside of 1) as opposed to 2 and 3 and has more story problems. You'd think  it would be the other way around.
Reply


Forum Jump: