Well I guess that will make my buddy happy. He's a GGer and was really upset about them taking the oversexualized Tracer pose out and is still seething about the Baldur's Gate DLC giving a female character a backstory and a quest. This should cheer him up and show that Blizzard really doesn't care about female representation after all, like he feared.
That is hilarious to me. I don't understand how people can get so "butthurt" about a stupid pose that means literally nothing.
If I were Blizzard I would've just given everyone else a sexy pose, and then say it's equal because everyone has one sexy pose.
I heard something about Crash Bandicoot is coming this year?
^Where did you hear about that? There has been on and off news about Crash's 'revival' but it always gets debunked.
what?....hold on a second. Namco is actually triying to trademark the word "finishing move"??, really?!?!?!
http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2016/apr/0...ing-games/
I mean, seriously: Trademarking blanket terms and concepts is an unsettling thought.
Trademarking and patents were intended to keep specific inventions and company names from being stolen, not to create a monopoly on a widespread idea like a finishing move or a Let's Play.
Namco also copyrighted minigames in loading screens so I can't say I'm surprised.
(04-07-2016, 02:40 PM)Colossus Wrote: [ -> ]Some headline on an IGN article (didn't watch)
http://www.ign.com/videos/2016/04/07/rog...-noon-live
and this image that is going around that I noticed today:
![[Image: dhFURCd.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/dhFURCd.jpg)
I am at work so I can't do any research into this.
The crash bandicoot discussion is around the 46:43 mark on the video. They mentioned that someone was wearing a Crash Bandicoot shirt out in the open, and how its leading to various speculations that Crash could return. So far the only thing I could find about Crash returning was
this.
(04-08-2016, 07:28 PM)Psychospacecow Wrote: [ -> ]Namco also copyrighted minigames in loading screens so I can't say I'm surprised.
i need source for that.....
why?
because i want YOU to give me a good reason
gouge my eyes out!
(04-09-2016, 08:30 AM)Space Jockey Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2016, 07:28 PM)Psychospacecow Wrote: [ -> ]Namco also copyrighted minigames in loading screens so I can't say I'm surprised.
i need source for that.....
why?
because i want YOU to give me a good reason to blind myslef!
I'm not sure what that last part means but
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/lo...ly-expires
It expired late last year.
(04-09-2016, 11:01 AM)Psychospacecow Wrote: [ -> ] (04-09-2016, 08:30 AM)Space Jockey Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2016, 07:28 PM)Psychospacecow Wrote: [ -> ]Namco also copyrighted minigames in loading screens so I can't say I'm surprised.
i need source for that.....
why?
because i want YOU to give me a good reason to blind myslef!
I'm not sure what that last part means but
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/lo...ly-expires
It expired late last year.
So it expired......Good! Looks like I have no reason to gouge my eyes out due to how cringey inducing the idea itself is (basically that's the meaning of the last part of my previous post).
![[Image: tracer-victory-pose-2-over-the-shoulder.png]](http://overwatch.blizzplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/tracer-victory-pose-2-over-the-shoulder.png)
![[Image: hanzo-victory-pose-3-over-the-shoulder.png]](http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/midas/e664c920815708199f5a3e4f82e2096a/203611210/hanzo-victory-pose-3-over-the-shoulder.png)
![[Image: windowmaker-victory-pose-4-over-the-shoulder.png]](http://kt-media.knowtechie.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/windowmaker-victory-pose-4-over-the-shoulder.png)
![[Image: mccree-victory-pose-2-over-the-shoulder.png]](http://girlsofthestorm.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/mccree-victory-pose-2-over-the-shoulder.png)
![[Image: soldier76-victory-pose-4-over-the-shoulder.png]](http://overwatch.blizzplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/soldier76-victory-pose-4-over-the-shoulder.png)